A Company

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Wednesday, 8 March 2006

Update: Lane’s Gifts v. Google

Posted on 13:58 by Unknown
Posted by Nicole Wong, Associate General Counsel

You may remember that last February, Google was sued in Arkansas over what is commonly called click fraud. We’re very near a resolution in that case, so we thought we’d offer an update.

We’ve been discussing the case with the plaintiffs for some time and have recently come to an agreement with them which we believe is a good outcome for everyone involved. As a result, Google and the plaintiffs are going to ask the judge to approve the settlement, which would resolve the case.

Until the settlement is approved by the judge, it is not final. And the details are confidential, but will become public when it is formally filed for the judge’s consideration. However, we can share the major pieces of our proposed agreement.

Google currently allows advertisers to apply for reimbursement for clicks they believe are invalid. They can do this for clicks that happen during the 60 days prior to notifying Google. Under the agreement with the plaintiffs, we are going to open up that window for all advertisers, regardless of when the questionable clicks occurred. For all eligible invalid clicks, we will offer credits which can be used to purchase new advertising with Google. We do not know how many will apply and receive credits, but under the agreement, the total amount of credits, plus attorneys fees, will not exceed $90 million.

This agreement covers all advertisers who claim to have been charged but not reimbursed for invalid clicks dating from 2002 when we launched our “cost per click” advertising program through the date the settlement is approved by the judge.

For the finance folks out there wondering how we’ll account for this, we can say that the attorneys’ fees (which will be determined by the judge) will be charged as an expense, most likely in the first quarter, once the amount is determined. The credits will be recorded as a reduction to revenue in periods in which they are redeemed.

We have said for some time that we believe we manage the problem of invalid clicks very well. We have a large team of expert engineers and analysts devoted to it. By far, most invalid clicks are caught by our automatic filters and discarded *before* they reach an advertiser’s bill. And for the clicks that are not caught in advance, advertisers can notify Google and ask for reimbursement. We investigate those clicks, and if we determine they were invalid, we reimburse advertisers for them. We will continue to do that, and believe that this settlement is further proof of our willingness to work together with advertisers to reimburse invalid clicks.

You can find more information on invalid clicks and how we manage them here or here.

Update: Added second link to more information.
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to Facebook
Posted in ads, policy and issues | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • About that fake post
    Posted by Karen Wickre, Google Blog team A bug in Blogger enabled an unauthorized user to make a fake post on the Google Blog last night, cl...
  • On the alert for bloggers
    Posted by Naga Sridhar Kataru, Software Engineer So many interesting blogs and so little time! If you're anything like me, you like to p...
  • School's in
    Posted by Dror Shimshowitz, Product Marketing Manager Getting ready for the new school year? There's a back-to-school shopping offer at ...
  • About the Google News case in Belgium
    Posted by Rachel Whetstone, European Director of Communications and Public Affairs You may have read recently about Google being taken to co...
  • Extras for your Mac Gmail Notifier
    Posted by Greg Miller, Software Engineer As some clever users have already discovered, the Gmail Notifier for Mac OS X we launched last we...
  • Google Print and the Authors Guild
    Posted by Susan Wojcicki, Vice President, Product Management Today we learned that the Authors Guild filed a lawsuit to try to stop Google P...
  • Preventing comment spam
    If you're a blogger (or a blog reader), you're painfully familiar with people who try to raise their own websites' search engine...
  • Avoiding RSI
    Posted by Dr. Taraneh Razavi, M.D., Staff Doctor From time to time, a resident physician at Google headquarters weighs in with her thoughts ...
  • Domains of choice
    In the realm of the Internet, there's no shortage of acronyms for all the parts of a web address. Top-level domains like .com, .org and ...

Categories

  • accessibility
  • ads
  • Africa
  • apps
  • April 1
  • Asia
  • books + book search
  • crisis response
  • developers
  • doodles
  • education and research
  • enterprise
  • Europe
  • free expression
  • google.org
  • googlers and culture
  • green
  • health
  • Latin America
  • mobile
  • online safety
  • personalization
  • photos
  • policy and issues
  • privacy
  • recipe
  • recruiting and hiring
  • scholarships
  • search
  • search trends
  • small business
  • user experience and usability
  • youtube and video

Blog Archive

  • ▼  2006 (231)
    • ►  October (27)
    • ►  September (26)
    • ►  August (32)
    • ►  July (18)
    • ►  June (25)
    • ►  May (19)
    • ►  April (20)
    • ▼  March (20)
      • Doing what they love, the rest follows
      • TechnoServe update: New program in Ghana
      • Kick this
      • And we're back
      • Google Reader learns to share
      • Expanding girls' horizons
      • Mac Gmail Notifier update
      • Spring is the season for love (and data)
      • Judge tells DoJ "No" on search queries
      • Courtside seats, without the court... or the seat
      • Stay in Ctrl Ctrl
      • A new home for @Last Software
      • Mars attracts
      • Pug-speak
      • Writely so
      • Update: Lane’s Gifts v. Google
      • A real find
      • Google News Israel
      • Robots and writers and Googlers, oh my!
      • The littlest Mini
    • ►  February (26)
    • ►  January (18)
  • ►  2005 (199)
    • ►  December (18)
    • ►  November (20)
    • ►  October (20)
    • ►  September (27)
    • ►  August (20)
    • ►  July (14)
    • ►  June (11)
    • ►  May (18)
    • ►  April (16)
    • ►  March (21)
    • ►  February (7)
    • ►  January (7)
  • ►  2004 (58)
    • ►  December (11)
    • ►  November (6)
    • ►  October (15)
    • ►  September (7)
    • ►  August (2)
    • ►  July (4)
    • ►  June (5)
    • ►  May (7)
    • ►  April (1)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile